Two routes, one injury
AFCS vs civil claim for military hearing loss
UK veterans with service-related hearing loss can apply to the Armed Forces Compensation Scheme, bring a civil negligence claim against the Ministry of Defence — or do both. This page explains the differences in plain English.
Direct answer
AFCS is a no-fault tariff scheme administered by Veterans UK. A civil claim is a fault-based negligence action against the MoD, normally valuing significantly higher because it recovers full loss of earnings, pension loss and care costs in addition to general damages.
Side-by-side
AFCS and civil claim compared
| AFCS | Civil claim | |
|---|---|---|
| Legal basis | No-fault statutory tariff scheme | Common law negligence claim against the MoD |
| Governing instrument | Armed Forces and Reserve Forces (Compensation Scheme) Order 2011 | Crown Proceedings (Armed Forces) Act 1987; Limitation Act 1980 |
| Need to prove fault? | No | Yes — breach of duty and causation |
| General damages | Tariff bands | Judicial College Guidelines (case-specific) |
| Loss of earnings | Limited (Guaranteed Income Payment for higher tariffs) | Recoverable in full where proven |
| Pension loss | Not separately recoverable | Recoverable where proven |
| Hearing aids & care | Not separately recoverable | Recoverable on evidence |
| Decision-maker | Veterans UK | MoD legal team / civil court |
| Time limit | Generally 7 years (with exceptions) | 3 years from date of knowledge |
| Typical timescale | Months | 12+ months once medical evidence is in place |
| Cost to claimant | Free to apply | No win, no fee (CFA) typical |
| Effect on pension | None | None |
In practice
Why many veterans pursue both
- AFCS is faster and provides early financial support while the civil claim is investigated.
- Civil claims recover heads of loss the AFCS does not — typically the biggest part of the award.
- Both routes rely on the same underlying medical and service evidence, so running them together is efficient.
- Crediting an AFCS award against a civil settlement avoids double recovery but does not bar either claim.
FAQs
AFCS vs civil claim — common questions
Yes. The Armed Forces Compensation Scheme and a civil negligence claim are separate routes with different rules and decision-makers. Many veterans pursue both. An AFCS award for the same injury may be taken into account in any civil settlement to prevent double recovery, but it does not bar the civil claim or reduce your pension entitlement.
Not sure which route suits your case?
Speak to a specialist military hearing loss solicitor for a free, no-obligation eligibility check. No win, no fee representation available.